A Sample Annotated Bibliography Entry

Because some students have asked – I am producing a very short, single-entry, MLA-formatted annotated bibliography (Works Cited list)


Works Cited

Poniewozik, James. “TV Makes a Too-Close Call.” Time, 20 Nov. 2000, pp. 70-71.

  • In this November 2000 article, James Poniewozik, a reporter for Time magazine, discusses the particulars of the 2000 Presidential election between Al Gore and George W. Bush. The article text articulates the facts of the competition, to wit, that both candidates had a nearly even share of the votes, while also lamenting broadcast television’s role in exacerbating the tensions around that contest. Poniewozik’s Jeremiad laments that TV broadcast has “tarnished” election night proceedings by turning what is by most accounts a rather dull process of counting ballots into the sort of stuff usually reserved for reality TV. In the end, Poniewozik encourages voters to retain their hope and faith in the democratic process despite the tawdriness of what happened at the turn of the century.
  • I can use Poniewozik’s article in my discussion of media and electoral politics largely as a historical timepiece. In hindsight, the author’s recollection of events seems quaint: the electoral shenanigans of 2000 and the ongoing count debacle that dominated headlines, seems altogether innocent compared to election contention 20 years later. As a result, I feel that this piece will allow me to posit that the more things change, the more they stay the same (media, election, mess) but also that while the situation may be similar in kind, things have gotten much, much worse by degree.

Social Media & Contact Gallimaufry

This page now features a Contact page – exciting, right?

You can now email Dr. Malesh directly from the “Contact” page, and you’ll also find links to the course Twitter and Discord channels.

Naturally, you can already just send an email or reach out via Canvas – but these other options exist for your convenience.

Now with Analytics!

Great news for all FIU Web Writers: FIU IT has re-added analytics!

Given the impending phase-out of FIU Google IDs, analytic functionality was not 100% available, but it looks like it’s back. This is a great step for anyone looking to analyze their visibility and optimize their web presence.

I’ll be testing this functionality over the next few days, but regardless this is an exciting development!

The Origins of Writing for the Web at FIU

Writing For the Web (course number still pending as of March 2022) is an evolution and adaptation – a hybrid of courses like ENC 3213 & 3249 (Technical and Professional Writing) and ENC 3416 (Writing and New Media).

This course is a practical, hands-on web writing course. Unlike ENC 3213 & 3249, all work is composed online and publicly: it is posted to the Internet for all the world to see, but like those courses, this work is intended for professional development (or something like it, e.g. nonprofit organization, community awareness, etc.). Unlike ENC 3416, the work is meant to be entirely pragmatic versus the strong theoretical & historical tack of Writing and New Media, but like 3416, Writing for the Web is acutely aware of emerging technology and how that intersects matters of authorship and readership.

This blog will be a place for students and any other observers to “check the temperature” of the discipline at FIU. How are we doing, overall? What seems to be a big hurdle? Where did we really “nail it”? What’s working? What would we like to see?

While this blog is starting out as a bellwether and update locus for the newly developed Web Writing course, it is also Dr. Malesh’s online blog at FIU and so will include all sorts of comments on student development, curricular changes, and emerging scholarship.

All posts are public and, at least from the outset, should allow for comments.

Welcome to Writing for the Web at FIU!